Are we still waiting???
of course we’re waiting, I think that is all we know how do to with this software! 
it’ll be awhile prolly late tonight before we know anything. I am sure they are gonna drag it out as long as they can. I was hoping somone ld have gotten one of the pixologic guys in a headlock by now and noogied it out of them.
Only Pixologic could make a moment like this so unpleasant.
W
LOL! I vote this as quote of the year!
I bet pixologic will dissapoint us all once again
so…anyone at siggraph booth?..are pixologic still tucked up in bed after a late night party?..booth empty…no sign of the crew!..maybe their all off demoing mudbox at the autodesk stand!
Knowing Pixologic, they’ll have some dork in a tie go up on stage and say “We have many exciting and innovative features for the Mac version of Zbrush 3.5/4. And you can expect to see them soon”. Meaning “Never”.
No one’s at the booth because they don’t have a Mac version to show for all this time.
Good News !!! Looks like you all will live long enough to see ZBrush 3.5 for mac after all!!!
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2008/08/11/2331197.htm?site=science
Cruel man! Cruel! LOL!
Not if it never comes out, then it doesn’t matter how long you live.
Every time I check in here & there is no news I do 25 push ups, there’s still no Zbrush 3 for Mac but now I can lift small a car…
Please give us news today Pix, anything, something… :rolleyes:
It’s obvious why they don’t say anything… because there is nothing to say. No one was ever even beta testing a Mac version because there is no Mac version.
just thought I should point out that beer will always be there
I’ve got a bad feeling about this.
WOW!
Really?
Nothing to report?
Nothing at all?
Are they really sitting in there booth with nothing to show? I can’t believe this company!
group hug?
they maybe ‘busy’ at the booth, fighting off mudbox 2009 looks with 3.5 new capabilities we’ve yet to see!
Either there is no news, or those that get news are passing out in disbelief!
Right, and out of those two possibilities, which one is more likely? :lol: