I can appreciate the quality artwork and the efforts that went into making the models, but at the same time, I cannot see the value of wasting such creativity on a movie that is among the worst I have seen in years. It didn’t take more than 15 minutes for a group of four people watching to say, “turn that junk off!” But then again, this doesn’t surprise me: Hollywood is notorious for putting out rubbish and expecting everyone to judge a lousy story with bad acting and a plot that might excite an eight year old to swoon over something simply because it has so-called good special effects.
Sorry, where I come from, a wart is still a wart regardless of how “realistic” you make it look; and as movies go, that one is a real embarrassment. All those who were involved in editing that and allowing that out into the public limelight ought to be fired. It’s wonderful that Zbrush could be used to achieve such impressive results, but those results have little to no value in the real world when they have been coupled to a LOSER.
In short: that flick didn’t do Zbrush any justice. To the contrary, I consider it an insult and I wouldn’t get caught dead having my worst artistic efforts be associated with that dog. Putting good art on a wart of a film will only impress those who can’t distinguish the difference between quality and pure crap.