If there is still only the canvas, and not true 3d space it would be kind of a let down. I mean, it’s dumb that I have to limit my “canvas size” because of hardware, and the amount it effects performance is rediculous. I can pull a mesh from zbrush into xsi and rotate zoom/pan at a decent speed at full screen… zbrush though, I have to have a window at like 640x480 to get that performance. Other than that I’m downright excited about the program, but for me, if it doesn’t have the above, and if I didn’t already own 2.0, I don’t think I would buy it. This millions of polygons thing is nothing new now with 64bit architectures, everyone will be supporting it.
Regarding Ryan’s first post and the quote above… why whould there need to be “more on that later?” Just come out and say if it is in true 3d space or faked perspective, or if we have to put up with it. I would understand the latter as this is an upgrade, aka a direct extension of what 2.0 was. I don’t expect a completely different program. If that’s what I’m getting it should be called 3.0 and I’d pay for it.