Hmmmmm well I don’t agree with the post on perspective. Many masterpieces of art throughout the ages did not rely upon perspective. I am an advocate of the artist capturing what he/she sees… if you do not “see” perspective don’t try to incorporate the known rules of it. Naive art is wonderful, one only has to look at Rousseau (probably the greatest artist of all time). I think you have captured a wonderful world in your image. What I will say however, is that your view of the world in paint may well need development, and should you find that there is a need for perspective in your world then by all means develop that and use it. There are too many “sheep” out there who try and conform to known artistic rules… and few who are wholly original.
Here on the forum a stand out ‘artist’ would be bozzie floosie ( I have the name spelt wrong I think) generally the rest fall into a tamed category with varying talents.
Me …I say continue as you are:)
As an after thought, the knowledge of perspective even if a person cannot “see” it…or when an artist understands it…can be a plus, particularly when developing ways to break the rules of perspective to achieve your vision. Cubism is a fine example of stretched and broken, or exaggerated perspective rules.
Within true art there are No “nevers”, and “Don’t do’s”… do as you feel.