Iv been thinking about what defines a great artest and what realy is talent.
Talent is somtimes associated with inteligence and natural ability to do somthink well, but is there more to it than that?
Passion is not enougth without skill, and skill is attained by knowledge and ability by puting into practice what we learn.
Another factor is imagination, it would seem that what defines talent is having inteligence by means of ability, skill, passioin, imaginatioin and knowledge.
Some people can,t draw as much as some can,t sing, but theres so many levels between poor and exceptional. Are these different levels of abilities attained from some of the keys above, but lacking others?
For exsample, someone realy wants to sculpt, but has no natural recorces to their aid, other than passion. These people would be get better over time based on learning ability. Would it be true to asume that these people would hit a brick wall at a certain stage where they never even get close to a talented individual that has all the recorces that amount to true tallent.
I know some people that have the focus, passion and patience to learn, yet never progress, would this be their brick wall?
Im interested in your views on this subject. Is there anyone that had no drawing skills yet attained the qualities needed to achive art that was of the standard by a so called tallented person?
Where would you put yourself, and what areas make up your tallents? Being that im asking, it wouldnt be seen as boastfull to answer.