Was my post really that inflamatory?  I didn’t mean it to be.  I was trying to end that line of discussion, though – both views have been debated to death in previous threads, and you introduced the subject by insulting the group of users I believe are the most valuable here.
(The apostrophe thing does weaken my post.  I acknowledge that, but enjoyed it too much – less puerile than poetic, I’d say.  :p)
Did you touch a nerve?  I’m not sure.  Indirectly, perhaps…
I’m not someone who’d correct your proportions, myself, even if you asked – I’m not qualified to. But I definitely appreciate that those people are around, and I’ll be damned if I’m going to let anyone make them feel stupid for speaking up.
Anyway, yes. You can argue all day that a fantasy creature is not bound by traditional rules, but our basic perception says differently. Psychology is a large part of any artform - ignore it at your peril.
EDIT:
Phil’s explained himself via PM, and seems like a great guy.  I officially back out of this debate, and apologize for the distraction.  Everyone, go back to critiquing the model so we can see the next version already!