I met a couple of the Modo guys at a Sigraf meeting and I have been toying with the idea of getting a copy of Modo, but not terribly seriously as I have ZBrush am trying to keep the windows app count as low as possible.
When I spoke with the Modo guys about Linux, I pointed out that the Mac is based on the linux core, that they must have a common codebase to have a windows and mac version, and that it’s probably just a recompile to get it running on Linux. They sort of looked like they thought a Linux version was highly doubtfull, citing driver issues.
I didn’t have the heart to tell them that I have an off the shelf Dell running Gentoo and Wine and the ZBrush demo and it runs flawlessly. I had also just been shown all of the amazingly ZBrush like features they are wrapping in so I asked them a slightly political question, “Are you trying to knock off ZBrush or what?”. They looked amused and a little arrogant and said they were allready better than them.
After seeing the demo I figured lets try this thing in Wine, and it became quite clear that it wasn’t running because the licensing server couldn’t find the demo certificate. I could probably get around that by copying it to the right place in Wine, but I figured lets try it in XP. I have to say I like certain things about Modo, but that thing crashed more often than any other 3D app I’ve ever owned, and their texture painting had serious issues with seams. It took forever to get any real texturing done.
The texture and material layering with transparencies is a ‘Good Idea’ and would love to see that adopted in other apps. Modo’s total lack of animation pretty much means I am using a another 3D app anyway, in my case XSI on Red Hat, and any of the benefits of using Modo go away.
Bottom line, Modo and Linux is not likely, and I’m not even sold on Modo on Windows. They demo’d it on a Mac G4 Quad CPU. I’m going to try the Mudbox here in a few minutes, so we shall see. I still think that ZBrush would work just fine in Linux, and whatever distribution they chose to go with, I would use.