Efstratios is that personal opinion or judging from the reference images?
Both I guess. It would depend on the woman though and the body type you’re going for. I personally just think they look underdeveloped. What reference did you use?
Here’s an hourglass body type which easily conveys a feminine form (although I personally find this model too thin), but of course you can portray her however you like. 
Attachments
It is posted within this thread. So i guess maybe you might want to look before you speak otherwise you may send me off trying to change something that is correct. Don’t get me wrong I appreciate the feedback but please make it correct.
Efstratios sorry for sounding so harsh but this model has been driving me nuts trying to get her likeness. Here is another update hope it is closer. I think it is but it might be wishful thinking on my part. Let me know what you all think.
[
](javascript:zb_insimg(‘199605’,‘asymmetryBody2.jpg’,1,0))
No, actually it’s my fault. The funny thing is that I had seen your reference the day before, but yesterday I must have skipped the first page and never realized that it was in relation to the same thread. Anyway, after looking at the reference again, I think you did a great job!
Ok last update for the weekend. Let me know if she is getting closer please.
[
](javascript:zb_insimg(‘199647’,‘asymmetryBody2.jpg’,1,0))
Hello.
I can tell you have put alot of time into this so well done for sticking at it. The female form is not easy and takes alot of practice.
Im very familiar with this refference Natalie as I have it, as well as many more from when I joined 3d.sk. Some refferences I found such as this one should not be used to tight, as they dont offer the average form, and give natural gesture.
When you start learning general anatomy, you can see where to deviate from the refference to get a more natural sculpt. Here are some things that I myself would change to get her more realistic. I try to bend the arms a little, and loosen up the hands. Enphasize on the natural way the pecs attatch outwards to the humerus, and how the delts overlap. Ad a bit more fat around the belly, and soften out the edge of the rib cage. Add a bit of fat to the knee area, and show how that forarm is twisted. Dont be afraid to dig a little deeper to show more rythem between the muscles, and how fat flanks sit, you can always use layers and smooth down what looks to hard.
I think she’s looking good. do you have a side profile we can look at?
Tez thanks for the suggestions I have started to incorporate some of them. I am trying for as close a likeness as possible to her not just the female form in general.
Articus thanks. Here is the side profile you asked for.
[
](javascript:zb_insimg(‘199846’,‘side_view.jpg’,1,0))
I think if you pull her face back a little it would look less dislocated. The depth of your facial features are to shallow as well. The head on the right are the adjustments.
Another update on her. I know the likeness of her face is not spot on and may not even be close, but I kind of like the look of her right now. What do you the community think? Thanks for the recommendations Articus, helped me see some flawed areas.
[
](javascript:zb_insimg(‘200902’,‘asymmetryBody4.jpg’,1,0))
I would have to agree with Articus. The features are nice from the front, but they don’t hold up as well from the side. The the adjustments in the image look spot on.
She’s looking good otherwise. Perhaps a little more definition here and there and it will be really great!
updated profile of face.
[
](javascript:zb_insimg(‘201051’,‘profile.jpg’,1,0))
Been going over the entire sculpt refining areas. Worked on the face a lot. I think she is closer but ill let the community decide. Let me know what you think.
[
](javascript:zb_insimg(‘202388’,‘asymmetryBody5.jpg’,1,0))
Your doin Great Bro. Remember what we spoke about, Keep at it man. All you can do from here is get better.
Looing good man. I know this is mainly a study of the female anatomy(which I think you have got down) , have you thought of adding some finer details like toe nails, skin pores etc?
I think that would really bring the model to life
Looing good man. I know this is mainly a study of the female anatomy(which I think you have got down) , have you thought of adding some finer details like toe nails, skin pores etc?
I think that would really bring the model to life
its a good study man, female form is very difficult to model, I’ll suggest finishing this asap and moving to the next one. I think you’ll need lots of anatomy references of skeleton and muscles, stylized drawings of girls, check loomis books(or other drawing books) to figure out the important lines which make the body look better. Good luck!
Thanks Rocky means a lot that you posted here. /idkfa thanks I have put a ton of work into her to get the likeness of the reference I am using. Barnesy I agree that adding the detail would bring her to life but I am trying to get the overall form right before adding such things. Here is another update on her next I will be doing more with the hands and the feet and adding the detail. Let me know what you all think.
[
](javascript:zb_insimg(‘206628’,‘tweaks3.jpg’,1,0))