Nikko, actual resolution is 1630 x 2038 pixels. That just seemed the max size my machine could comfortably handle, without waiting forever between each brush stroke. Below is a portion at actual size.

There are still places on the image I need to touch up to make it print ready. Which reminds me, a little note on resolution for print media. Common practice in the business is to have rastorized images at 300ppi (not dpi) at 100% of the size being used. For example 4 x 5 at 300ppi (1200 x 1500 pixels) or 8 x 10 at 300ppi (2400 x 3000). This resolution is based on printing screens at 133-150 dpi. In fact, 300ppi is overkill. Probably better to use a resolution of 225 - 285 ppi. These resolutions, from the beginning, related to ‘scanned’ images. Unfortunately, this is still the standard for images produced from scratch, digitally! The apparent resolution of digitally created images is much greater. You would be hard pressed to tell the difference between a digitally created image at 150ppi and 300ppi and printed using a 150 line screen. I only bring this up because a service bureau or publication will usually ask for a 300ppi image. And will often not except it at a lower resolution. To them, the customer is not always right. Even if the customer is the artist that created the image! The memory and processing power needed to create images as large or larger than 8.5 x 11 at 300ppi in a 3d package can be prohibitive for most people. Many times, detail is lost when an image is at too high of a resolution for the dimensions required. An image setter (which is producing film for burning plates) has to actually “decide” what part of the image to discard when it breaks the image up into little dots. The more optimal, not greater the resolution of the image, the better it will look when printed.
Okay, where the hell was I going?
Oh yeah, thanks again for all the great comments. It’s like looking at my work through fresh eyes.
Adman