You are all very kind to replay and discus with me… i’m really happy… THANX!
well i would like to answer each of you but it’s a time in between work so no hard feelings…
Bas Mazur:
like i have sad above i agree with a wrong forum… sorry once more… but still I do not agree that this question is not on the right place… but i have explained that in the previous post…
so you studied art and you ask me what is content of Michelangelo or Mondrian… content of Michelangelo’s work is most of the time spiritual, religious and biblical, he painted/sculpted stories from the bible usually ordered from the church but he was still adding his interpretation trough character, their form and expressions, David is a THE first human and Michelangelo tried to make his interpretation of THE FIRST HUMAN CREATED, so every detail of that artwork is based on his wish, his goal.
Mondriaan’s content is a composition, color, balance and their aesthetics and co-relation, he did experiments with those elements to active the perfect balance in-between of them…
hope those short explanation are sufficient…
… what i want to insist is not the even story behind works but most of all reason… reason of art, for me, it was always to communicate something even to communicate emotion, abstract, imaginative or real (even if i do exercise in a new softwar it is still just my tool)… and even if there is a point that communicate: is it obvious, is it cheep, is it already so much used that we do not even notice it?
… i went in the school FABRICA, established and lead by Oliviero Toscani (guy who did the advertising for United Colors Of Benetton) who was Andy’s Warhol student, and he showed me that you can communicate even trough simple commercial for the cloths…
… my second teacher was Stanley Kubrick, even if i have never met him, and he teach me how every single detail in the work have to have a motivation and reason and have to communicate on sometimes different artistic levels (and he was working with film in wish there are almost all details that you could imagine to work with).
… my third teacher was Jasujiro Ozu that showed me how to express transcadental feeling trough art…
… when i start my work, i think what i want to say, and defining this it leads me trough all creation process: how do i say it best? how my characters are going to look, their proportions, styling, all but always lead by my first goal which is WHAT I HAVE TO SAY…
… creating a character is not mastering all tools in zBrush it is first of all creating his characteristic which are in the parallel relation of the thing that you want to communicate…
… and what i have already sad: “what the people are posting here is not just a software related technical problem… it is also gallery for their work…” is the reason why this question is on the right place…