1. #16
    Senior Member User Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Zurich
    Posts
    772

    Default

    i think it works pretty well, and will be in heavy use

  2. #17
    Senior Member User Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Longley, Huddersfield, UK
    Age
    47
    Posts
    757

    Default

    Thankyou for this useful looking plugin, Marcus. I`ve been comparing UV mesh screen grabs in Photoshop with the ZB polyframe display mode till now. Polys that were the same size in both apps. gave good Projection Master results.

    I can`t say I`ve tested your plugin extensively, but initial results seem to have it scaling the models to about half the size my Photoshop comparisons would lead me to expect. Even with only one poly left un-hidden. Does this reveal a misapprehension on my part about the relationship between Photoshop and ZB screen space?

    Cheers,

    R

  3. #18
    Moderator User Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    7,658

    Default

    Thanks for the comments and feedback guys, much appreciated.

    Rory_L,

    Your method of comparing images in Photoshop is a good one, provided your ZBrush screen grabs are at actual size.

    Have you tried the plugin with the test files I provide? The descrepancy you are seeing may be because Pixol>Pixel averages the mesh (and takes into account the whole visible mesh, not just the forward-facing polys). I realize that you've tried it with a single polygon but unfortunately the algorithm for partially hidden meshes is not as good and tends to break down when only a few polys are showing. (I hope to improve this but there are limits to the information available thru zscripting.) The test textures are a good way of seeing how the plugin is performing as you can immediately see where texture distortion may be affecting the result.

    If you felt like sending me one of your models, I'd be interested to do some tests myself.

    HTH,
    Last edited by marcus_civis; 07-24-06 at 01:45 AM.

  4. #19
    Moderator User Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    7,658

    Default Testing method for laid-out UVs

    Here's another method for checking how the plugin is performing. It's ideal for when you have laid out UVs using a pelting method or similar (rather than GUV/AUV tiles).

    1. Load your model with UVs assigned.
    2. Create a new texture of a suitable size.
    3. Press Tool>Texture>UV>Txr This will create a texture showing your UV layout.
    4. Press Texture>CropAndFill.
    5. Create a new Layer. Create a new texture the same size as step [2]. Draw your model on the canvas and press the Pixol>Pixel button.
    6. Turn off Render>Flatten.
    7. With your model in Edit mode: Turn off the texture. Turn on PolyFrames. Select a material with transparency such as BasicMaterial and put the Material Modifiers> Transparency silder to about -80.
    8. Reposition your model to check the scaling.

    TestUV.jpg

  5. #20
    Senior Member User Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Longley, Huddersfield, UK
    Age
    47
    Posts
    757

    Default

    Thanks for the offer Marcus. Sending you models is not possible: Sony property and all that!

    I didn`t know about the low-poly algorithm shortcomings. That probably explains it all.

    Haven`t tried the test models you provided: they`re probably beautifully UVd. The UVs I`m working with are anything but ideal, with large UV area/poly size discrepancies; probably quite a challenge for your plugin!

    I`ll keep using the plugin and give it a more robust trial.

    Thanks again,

    R

  6. #21
    Senior Member User Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    India
    Posts
    1,067

    Default

    Hey Marcus mound this late but maybe right on time.

    great plugin, you should have added it in the plugin menu under your name

  7. #22
    Senior Member User Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    638

    Default

    wow thanks! gonna try this tonight...

    froyd
    nosce te ipsum!

    ZBrush Link Database: z-links.de
    chat with us on IRC: #zbrush / EFnet

  8. #23
    Senior Member User Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    418

    Default

    Hopefully this is exactly what I have been waiting for.

    Thanks very much.

    Mike R

  9. #24
    Senior Member User Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Zurich
    Posts
    772

    Default

    was using this script heavily for a while now. From what ive seen it works pretty well with heads or bodyparts.

    thanks again

  10. #25
    Moderator User Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    7,658

    Default

    Thanks guys for your comments and thanks Erklaerbar for your feedback, much appreciated.

  11. #26
    New Member User Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1

    Default

    does this work with Mac's?

  12. #27
    Moderator User Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    7,658

    Default

    fispaste,

    Yes, it should do.

  13. #28
    New Member User Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    8

    Default

    Thanks i will have a look at this later

  14. #29
    Senior Member User Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    U.K.
    Age
    46
    Posts
    394

    Default

    Thanks Marcus it works great, and will make texture transfer very accurate. A great plugin!

  15. #30
    Senior Member User Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    188

    Default

    Do you intend Zb3 this plugin anytime soon?I really feel I could
    use for it what I'm doing.

    Anyway,it's good to know it exists.

    Keep on!you're the lighthouse ZB plugins!

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •