View Full Version : Red Army Cyborg final
Willkrinpetry
05-05-09, 05:27 AM
zz2.jpg scena de lupta lip.jpg
Hello all.
Thi is the final concept. I hope you like. In my blog I post a largest vesion of this work end some extra renders.
www.artofpetry.blogspot.com
Twitchmonkey
05-05-09, 05:59 AM
A very ghastly sight, but well made. So good job.
Art-Machine
05-05-09, 07:01 AM
I've never been a fan of "just because" nudity. To me it communicates an immature or perverted artist.
Design wise it makes no sense for someone to be pants-less and wearing a skimpy tank top in the middle of a gun fight. In fact the nudity is detracting from the whole piece since you can't help but shake your head at that vagina and see nothing else. Don't know why you decided not to use the (better) clothed version that let you focus more on the concept as a whole.
Sorry bud, times like these you learn that tagging sex on your piece doesn't automatically sell it.
Yiked :confused: :lol:
Reminds me of Warhammer art... Though I don't understand why she wouldn't be wearing underpants, even a thong..
:)
feder!co
05-05-09, 07:21 AM
The sculpt looks pretty good, i think i preferred her with hair and clother though...
Design wise it makes no sense for someone to be pants-less and wearing a skimpy tank top in the middle of a gun fightMaybe she emits some type of toxic gas from there? :eek:
Willkrinpetry
05-05-09, 08:28 AM
I dont care about your opinion. You maybe an false pudibond. Nudity is not pornography. Remember that.
I always find nudity teh funny ;] I like it, it makes me lol, but the background is way to simple.
To me it communicates an immature or perverted artist.
And what i find even more funny are the ppl that arent "mature" enought to accepot that someone can like nudity, and dosnt have to be a total pervert.
Disco Stu
05-05-09, 09:34 AM
a vagina that almost looks like a little dick (why is pe+nis censored but vagina not btw?? i find this sexist :D ) as focus point and no clothes on a character that should have
armor as its obviosly some kind of battlemech is closer to pornography then
it is to nudity. However if it was nicely made it wouldnt bother me.
The mechanical parts that obviously should be the focus point of such a
character are rather shabby and could use a complete reworking.
The upper bodypart has potential but you destroyed it.
Also if u dont bother about opinions and react in this manner at 44 years of
age you should consider not posting at all.
cheers
nerveink
05-05-09, 09:57 AM
HEY HEY CMON GUYS!!! chill out dudes. what up with the harsh crits!?!? i think you guys are going too hard on this guy about about the nudity.
i think we have seen some more peverted stuff on here that actually had gotten a top row..
(not sayin your stuff is peverted, but yeah man she could probably use some pants. or a kilt!
disco stu?? i always seem to find myself laughing at your posts man. sometimes i think you go a little overboard with your comments and harsh criticism. I think thats pretty messed up. for someone of your skill i dont think you have the right to be calling someones work "shabby".
markkens
05-05-09, 11:39 AM
Wilkinpetry, from a practical aspect I can see why she wouldn't struggle to get pants on over all that gear...
And I don't see you doing all that modeling just to show a little T&A. :D
Grindhouse, people. Interesting.
Julian_K
05-05-09, 11:45 AM
funny enough, the artist here just dared to model a vagina on an overall quite interesting and pretty original character. the face of her is not less expressive than her vagina, but it is you guys who only focus on the *****. ironical, isn't it? or does it bother you that her face isn't pretty?
and no .. it's not the vagina that forces you to not look anywhere else. that is a ridiculously hypocrite excuse. be grown up and take responsibility for your own perception, will you? :)
the saddest part of this though is, that nobody takes offense by the violence depicted there ( or in any other thread for that matter).
blood and gore... it's all good, but oh my god - a vagina!! what a bad bad thing to show!
this- ladies and gentleman is what is really sick and perverted. not the vagina.
Willkrinpetry
05-05-09, 11:47 AM
I work in ZBrush becase is a grate program and I work for my plesure. I ame profesionist and I post on this forum iven I have 100 years, bat I se your work end...sory, you have very long way to be god. So...please STOP INSOLT ME !!!!
Julian_K
05-05-09, 12:06 PM
a vagina that almost looks like a little dick (why is pe+nis censored but vagina not btw??
neither should be, actually.
oh and it does not look like a little dick.it's mainly the labia you see and not the klit. obviously you didn't look close enough ;)
as focus point and no clothes on a character that should have
armor as its obviosly some kind of battlemech is closer to pornography then
it is to nudity.
is that so ? who says it is a battlemech? to me it didn't appear so at all.
the whole point seems to be exactly the mix between human and machine. and her nudity makes that contrast even stronger. I would even go so far as saying that without that very naked and thus vulnerable vagina the charater wouldn't be half as interesting. it would end up being just another battle mech or android sample.
However if it was nicely made it wouldnt bother me.
The mechanical parts that obviously should be the focus point of such a
character are rather shabby and could use a complete reworking.
The upper bodypart has potential but you destroyed it.
again - is that so? the mechanical parts should so obviously be the focus point? and why would that be? ah wait... because you want to see a battlemech ;)
and come on.. maybe this isn't the technical most incredible and detailed work ever posted here, but it is also certainly not shabby.
oh but of course, I forgot... you own work is far superior. right? ;)
I wish she was rougher looking. Im happy to see something other than the anime looking chick with a thong and boobs the size of blimps looking like she wants sex 24x7. Only crit for me is that she would be even better roughed up, maybe the body is still a bit idealized. Its a disturbing image to me due to the foreign concept. So good technical execution :tu:, and totally bizaar concept:tu: .
Disco Stu
05-06-09, 09:14 AM
With battlemech i meant a human and mech mixup guess i picked the wrong
word. I mean.. its pretty obvious that its not supposed to be a complete
mech.
Nerveink: You are right about that :( But.. i didnt call the work shabby!
I like the upper body part the clothes and the face.
The only thing i sayd wasnt good is the mech legs.
I stand behind what i wrote there even if the rest makes me sound like
a 16 year old flamerkid.
They simply stand out as the weakest part of the character and i would
consider reworking them to get a better one.
I like heavy metal comic illustrations and in my opinion tits make far better
nudity then a vagina.
As for "for someone of your skill i dont think you have the right to be calling someones work "shabby"." i think that is nonsense.
You dont have to be the inventor of the wheel to tell if its rolling or not.
As for "blood and gore... it's all good, but oh my god - a vagina!! what a bad bad thing to show!
this- ladies and gentleman is what is really sick and perverted. not the vagina."
Youre completely right but blood and gore plus senseless nudity was the
wtf where is this gonna end moment that got me to post at all.
and yes it doesnt look like a dick but your right i cant really see...
maybe post some closeups? :cool: :tu:
Julian_K
05-06-09, 03:55 PM
With battlemech i meant a human and mech mixup guess i picked the wrong
word. I mean.. its pretty obvious that its not supposed to be a complete
mech.
Nerveink: You are right about thathttp://zbrushcentral.com/zbc/images/smilies/frown.gif But.. i didnt call the work shabby!
I like the upper body part the clothes and the face.
The only thing i sayd wasnt good is the mech legs.
I stand behind what i wrote there even if the rest makes me sound like
a 16 year old flamerkid.
They simply stand out as the weakest part of the character and i would
consider reworking them to get a better one.
I like heavy metal comic illustrations and in my opinion tits make far better
nudity then a vagina.
As for "for someone of your skill i dont think you have the right to be calling someones work "shabby"." i think that is nonsense.
You dont have to be the inventor of the wheel to tell if its rolling or not.
As for "blood and gore... it's all good, but oh my god - a vagina!! what a bad bad thing to show!
this- ladies and gentleman is what is really sick and perverted. not the vagina."
Youre completely right but blood and gore plus senseless nudity was the
wtf where is this gonna end moment that got me to post at all.
and yes it doesnt look like a dick but your right i cant really see...
maybe post some closeups? :cool: :tu: fair enough :)
although I do think the vagina is still the better choice, because it is less of the usual heavy metal cliche than tits.
plus - obviously as we just see here,the vagina is more thought provoking ;)
but that's just a matter of different tastes and expectations ..
peace.
have a great day...
Disco Stu
05-06-09, 04:59 PM
haha :D :tu:
u too but its 2:38 am here so ill make that a good night :D
Morph Division
05-06-09, 08:22 PM
IMO the anatomy isn't there yet and the environment is really low quality, meaning it looks like previz blocking.
As for the nudity, my first impression was, she must be some kind of "siren"... but why a ruffneck space marine would be drawn sexually to this chick in the middle of a fire fight is a mystery. Maybe its a comment on war crimes?
Either way wtf is with the preconception that good art = "maturity".
If this piece was "Expertly" done I would love it, as it stands though Willkrinpetry you should spend more time on it.
Willkrinpetry
05-07-09, 01:04 AM
You Are Very,very, Very, Antalented. Remember !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Preserv For Yourself Any Advise.
yosemie
05-28-09, 05:51 PM
funny enough, the artist here just dared to model a vagina on an overall quite interesting and pretty original character. the face of her is not less expressive than her vagina, but it is you guys who only focus on the *****. ironical, isn't it? or does it bother you that her face isn't pretty?
and no .. it's not the vagina that forces you to not look anywhere else. that is a ridiculously hypocrite excuse. be grown up and take responsibility for your own perception, will you? :)
the saddest part of this though is, that nobody takes offense by the violence depicted there ( or in any other thread for that matter).
blood and gore... it's all good, but oh my god - a vagina!! what a bad bad thing to show!
this- ladies and gentleman is what is really sick and perverted. not the vagina.art machine just made constructive criticism, that's all
looks like criticism is bad here
Dave Meraggio
05-29-09, 12:10 PM
Wow, I just can't believe how some minds around here see more evil in showing a vagina rather than blood, chopped limbs, death and war! Nobody cries about the agony of the shredded man below?
BTW, this is a sick concept! I think the mix is the heavy thing. I personally don't like it, I feel it is some kind of spoilt beauty (what makes it worth) and (just my experience) harms my senses when put out of any diegetic context. But, I admit, it's effective, respect it because of showing such an incoherent reaction in the watching minds. I could like it as a part of somethig else... a grindhouse movie, maybe.
lol. you can see her gash:lol:
That's really gross. It looks like an old man with a vag.
sixscandals
06-13-11, 12:23 AM
maybe it's not the vagina that's dissing everybody out. maybe it's the owner of the vagina. i've seen the other posts, and it seems the vagina sensibilities seem to reflect the model.
idk though just a theory. peace! :)
Well, considering your skills, I guess everything is intentional. A bit over the top for me, but its a brave concept which I like :D Very enjoyable drawings on your blog :tu:
jorjastandish
07-10-11, 06:52 PM
NICE!!!!!:tu:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.